Dated by default
Comparisons and model-selection guides are written as time-bound documents, not evergreen truths.
Editorial policy
How Stellary publishes and updates comparison content
How Stellary dates articles, handles updates, and separates evidence from opinion to keep comparisons useful in fast-moving software categories.
Updated April 11, 2026
Evidence before claims
We prefer implementation details, product behavior, and explicit methodology over vague positioning language.
Revision cadence
High-volatility topics such as AI models are revisited more often than legal or product-overview content.
Dating and freshness
Posts about software comparisons, MCP clients, and AI models include an explicit publication date and may also display a last reviewed date when the content has been refreshed.
- Model comparisons should be revisited monthly when the market is moving fast
- Tool comparisons should be reviewed at least quarterly
- Implementation docs are updated when routes, behavior, or integration flows change materially
How we write evaluations
We try to separate what a tool is good at, where it becomes limiting, and which team context changes the recommendation. We avoid winner-style content that ignores trade-offs.
When content includes a Stellary mention, it should come as part of a broader category explanation rather than as the first framing of the article.
Corrections and updates
If a page becomes misleading because a product changed, we update the page, revise the date when appropriate, and keep the comparison logic aligned with the new state of the market.
We also update internal links when newer pillar pages or docs become the better reference target.